When you are authoring audio in Wwise, CPU usage is an essential concern. It is also important to balance performance and quality. If you are authoring for multiple platforms, you will have to be aware of each platform's technical limitiations and requirements, and also consider the CPU resources required by any accompanying software.
Many Wwise features and plug-ins affect CPU usage. The topics in this section provide an overview of the major factors that affect CPU usage and offer different strategies and best practices for CPU optimization. In general, the process consists of using the Profiler (refer to Profiling) to monitor CPU performance, determine which factors you need to address, and then use the guidelines in this section as a starting point to explore possible solutions.
Every Wwise project is different, available CPU resources vary by platform, and quality and performance requirements also vary, so there is no single set of specific guidelines or recommendations that apply to all cases. Instead, you will have to experiment, listen to your sounds in Wwise, and determine the optimal settings. The following major factors affect CPU usage:
Number of concurrent voices. The number of voices, especially physical voices, has a large impact on CPU. As the number increases, CPU usage increases with it.
Effects. Wwise audio Effects consume CPU and the amount varies depending on the specific Effect, where the Effect is used, and whether it is rendered.
Audio codecs. Audio file conversion with codecs uses CPU, and some codecs require more CPU resources than others.
Spatial Audio. The various options and settings that control 3D acoustics can have a major impact on CPU usage.
Each of these topics is described in further detail in the following sections.
Because there are so many variables that contribute to CPU usage in Wwise, there is no single, easy way to optimize CPU usage in all cases. Instead, you have to consider all of the factors that are relevant to your project, determine acceptable levels of CPU usage (which can vary by platform), then use the Wwise Profiler to identify which properties and settings use the most CPU and adjust them accordingly. The right balance between CPU and quality is ultimately a matter of judgment.
As a general approach, use the Profiler (refer to Profiling) to monitor performance during Capture Sessions, identify overall CPU usage and peaks, and then view the specific factors that contribute to CPU usage in the Advanced Profiler and Performance Monitor. In particular, pay attention to the following things:
In the Advanced Profiler, the CPU tab displays all of the elements that contributed to CPU usage during the session. You can then identify which plug-ins, audio codecs, Effects, and so on use the most CPU resources.
In the Performance Monitor Settings dialog, select any relevant items that include CPU in the name. The following options can be useful in the graph, the list, or both:
CPU - Plug-in Total
CPU - Total
Spatial Audio - CPU
Spatial Audio - Path Validation CPU
Spatial Audio - Portal Path Validation CPU
Spatial Audio - Portal Raytracing CPU
Spatial Audio - Raytracing CPU
A combination of the options in the Advanced Profiler and Performance Monitor provide a comprehensive portrait of CPU usage during a Capture Session. After you identify which factors contribute to CPU usage, you can use the suggestions described in the other topics in this section to optimize your project's performance.
The number of concurrent physical voices (that is, sounds that actually play) has a major impact on CPU usage. To reduce the amount of CPU resources that voices use, you can use the following settings to reduce the number of concurrent voices:
Playback limits determine the maximum number of instances of a sound that can play at the same time.
Priority determines which sounds to kill or send to virtual voice behavior in the event that the playback limit is exceeded.
Virtual voices are sounds that occur during runtime but do not actually play if they fall below a defined volume threshold or exceed the defined playback limits. The recommended virtual voice behavior is "Kill if finite else virtual". Refer to Advanced category: Actor-Mixer Hierarchy objects.
For more information, refer to Managing priority.
Effects consume CPU resources. In general, CPU usage increases with the number of Effect instances that play at the same time, although there are several additional considerations:
Number of channels. CPU usage increases with the number of audio channels, and the number of channels varies with the audio bus. For example, three instances of an Effect on a mono sound (three channels) use fewer CPU resources than a single instance of an Effect on a 7.1 bus (eight channels).
In addition, certain Effects such as Object Processors, are only instantiated once per bus instance. For more information on Effects, Audio Objects, and buses, refer to Using Effects with Audio Objects.
Type of Effect. Different types of Effect use different amounts of CPU. Reverb Effects are a special case, because although most other Effects cause a linear increase in CPU usage as the number per channel increases, reverb Effects have a flatter rate of increase. Within the reverb Effect category, different types of reverb use different amounts of CPU: Matrix Reverb uses less CPU than RoomVerb, for example, although it has fewer options. Other Effects, such as Compressor or Parametric EQ, use less CPU than reverbs.
Effect rendering. One way to reduce Effect CPU consumption is to render Effects so that they are part of the WEM files themselves. When Effects are rendered, they are processed before they are packaged in SoundBanks and therefore do not consume runtime processing power. You can identify Effects that are good candidates for rendering through the Integrity Report: select the Optimizations option and run the report. For more information about rendering, refer to Rendering Effects.
Bypassing Effects. If certain Effects are only applicable in certain situations, you can selectively bypass them. For example, if you have a distortion Effect that only occurs during certain player states in a game, you can use an RTPC to apply a Bypass Effect linked to a Game Parameter that monitors player states.
Wwise uses audio codecs to compress and decompress audio files. Typically, you need to compress audio files so that they fit within a project's memory budget. However, codecs require CPU resources, and in general the codecs that produce the highest quality audio also use the most CPU. When deciding which codecs to use, you will have to balance CPU usage, memory usage, storage space, and audio quality.
If you need to support multiple platforms, you can use different codecs for different platforms through Conversion Settings ShareSets. For more information, refer to Creating audio Conversion Settings ShareSets.
Wwise supports the following codecs:
PCM is not an audio codec, but rather an uncompressed file format. It provides high-quality sound and uses minimal CPU processing power, but requires a lot of storage space.
To minimize CPU usage, use this format for short, repetitive sounds or high-fidelity audio.
Vorbis is a very popular codec that provides good quality audio for a modest amount of CPU resources, and in Wwise it is optimized for interactive media and gaming platforms.
To minimize CPU usage, avoid this format for audio files that repeat frequently because some CPU power is required to decompress the files whenever they play. Vorbis works well with most other types of sound, however.
Opus provides similar quality audio to Vorbis with greater file compression. However, it requires more CPU resources than Vorbis. It can be useful for long, non-repeating audio sources such as dialog or ambiences. Refer to the platform-specific sections in the Wwise SDK for more details on decoding Opus files.
ADPCM provides good compression and uses minimal CPU power at the cost of quality. Use it with mobile platforms to minimize CPU usage and runtime memory.
In Wwise, the term "spatial audio" refers to a variety of settings and configurations that relate to sound in simulated 3D environments, such as attenuation, diffraction, reflection, and so on. There are many aspects of spatial audio that require CPU processing power so you will have to test different options and decide on the appropriate balance between quality and performance.
In Wwise Authoring, many of the options are available in the Property Editor. See Positioning category: Actor-Mixer Hierarchy and music objects and Positioning category: Audio and Auxiliary Busses).
Spatial audio uses CPU processing power for numerous calculations related to emitter and listener positioning, sound attenuation, sound reflection off of 3D objects, diffraction, and so on. There are many possible combinations of spatial audio Effects and settings, so there are no simple guidelines for CPU optimization. However, the following suggestions might be helpful if you notice that spatial audio is consuming a lot of CPU resources in the Profiler:
Ensure that the spatial geometry is as simple as possible. Minimize the number of triangles and the number of diffraction edges.
Use finite attenuations for sounds. As the maximum attenuation radius increases, more CPU processing power is required to search for paths. When a finite attenuation curve reaches its maximum distance, the curve drops below the audibility threshold set in the project settings.
Avoid playing sounds if they are too far away to be heard, and stop them when they move beyond the attenuation radius and will not return.
Use rooms and portals to isolate independent sections of a scene.
When initializing spatial audio, you can set several Spatial Audio Initialization Settings to control CPU usage:
Use CPU load balancing.
Increase the movement threshold required to calculate reflections and diffraction, which reduces CPU usage at the cost of accuracy.
Reduce the number of primary rays used in the raytracing engine.
Reduce the maximum reflection order. First-order and second-order are sufficient in most cases.
Reduce the diffraction order. Start with 4, but even 2 or 1 can be usable.
For more information on spatial audio, including suggestions on CPU optimization, refer to the following documents:
In the Wwise Help, refer to Defining positioning.
In the SDK, refer to Spatial Audio. In particular, refer to Improving Performance.
In the Unreal integration documentation, refer to Unreal Spatial Audio Tutorials.
In the Unity integration documentation, refer to Spatial Audio in Unity.
In addition to this documentation, there are several resources that contain information about CPU optimization:
Optimizing CPU Usage discusses optimization in the context of the SDK, which provides developers with additional options that are not available in the user interface.
Two blog articles, Wwise CPU Optimizations: General Guidelines and How to get a hold on your voices - Optimizing for CPU (PART 1), discuss optimization. However, note that the specific numbers in the articles might not be valid for the latest platforms.
The Wwise 251 certification course contains many examples and recommendations for CPU (and memory) optimization. It uses the Unity-based Wwise Adventure Game sample program as an example.
Cette page a-t-elle été utile ?
Besoin d'aide ?
Des questions ? Des problèmes ? Besoin de plus d'informations ? Contactez-nous, nous pouvons vous aider !
Visitez notre page d'AideDécrivez-nous de votre projet. Nous sommes là pour vous aider.
Enregistrez votre projet et nous vous aiderons à démarrer sans aucune obligation !
Partir du bon pied avec Wwise